PEMF · Compare
FlexPulse G2 vs EarthPulse ProPlus
Both are among the more transparent local devices we score, leading with a peak but publishing real frequency tables and named waveforms around it. The FlexPulse offers a far wider frequency range and per-program detail; the EarthPulse is cheaper and sleep-oriented with an honest in-use range. In our view the FlexPulse wins on programmability, the EarthPulse on value.
Two portable coil devices that disclose more than most. The FlexPulse G2 ($849) pairs a peak 200-gauss figure with a fully published per-program frequency table (3 to 999 Hz) and a named trapezoidal waveform. The EarthPulse ProPlus ($499) publishes a 1,100-gauss peak plus an honest in-use range, a sub-15 Hz band, and a named square waveform.
| $849 | Price | $499 |
| 20000 µT peak (not a spec) | Field spec | 110000 µT peak (not a spec) |
| 3-999 Hz | Frequency | 0.5-14.4 Hz |
| disclosed | Waveform | disclosed |
| none claimed | FDA | none claimed |
| targeted coil | Format | targeted coil |
Score breakdown
| 2.0 | Verified Field Spec30% | 2.0 |
| 2.0 | Regulatory Honesty20% | 1.0 |
| 8.0 | Frequency & Programmability15% | 8.0 |
| 5.0 | Coverage & Applicators15% | 5.0 |
| 0.0 | Value20% | 5.0 |
FAQ
- Which has the wider frequency range?
- The FlexPulse G2, by a large margin: it publishes a per-program frequency table spanning 3 to 999 Hz, while the EarthPulse ProPlus concentrates on a sub-15 Hz band suited to its sleep focus. Both name their waveforms, which is a disclosure point our rubric rewards.