PEMF devices, scored
Ranked by composite. The field column is the honest line: a PEMF field claim only counts as a real spec when it is a field strength in units published at a stated frequency, not a momentary "up to X gauss" peak or a unit-less intensity dial. We score disclosure and specs, not health outcomes.
Read the bands carefully
Most devices here land in Limited, and that is mostly a statement about disclosure. Field spec is our heaviest dimension, and many PEMF devices lead with a peak gauss headline or a unit-less "intensity level" rather than a sustained field at a stated frequency. A Limited device can still be well made - it just has not published a field claim we can check. We say nothing here about what any device does to the body; we score only what is measurable and disclosed.
| Score | Device | Field |
|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | Bemer Pro-Set (Evo) | 35 µT spec |
| 6.4 | OMI Full Body PEMF Mat | 220 µT spec |
| 6.2 | HealthyLine Platinum Mat 7224 | 300 µT spec |
| 3.8 | EarthPulse ProPlus | 110000 µT peak |
| 3.4 | Swiss Bionic Omnium1 2.0 | 120 µT peak |
| 3.2 | NeoRhythm | 2500 µT peak |
| 3.0 | TeslaFit Plus 2 | 399000 µT peak |
| 3.0 | FlexPulse G2 | 20000 µT peak |
| 2.6 | ICES DigiCeutical A9 | 20000 µT peak |
| 2.5 | Pulse XL Pro | 20000 µT peak |
| 1.9 | HUGO Pro | 1200000 µT peak |
| 1.1 | Oska Pulse | no figure |
| 1.0 | ALMAG-01 | 20000 µT peak |