What field strength does the Oska Pulse publish?

It publishes no field strength in any unit, only a coverage area and an automatic 1 to 150 Hz sweep, which is the weakest field disclosure in our catalog. In our scoring there is no field figure to verify, so the field dimension is capped and flagged.

Does 'FDA-registered Class 1' mean the Oska Pulse is FDA cleared?

No. In our framing FDA registration/listing is paperwork, not a 510(k) clearance, and we found no clearance for the device, so we flag the registration language rather than crediting a clearance.

PEMF · wearable

Oska Pulse

A pocket-sized wearable that publishes a frequency sweep and a field coverage area but no field strength in any unit, and leans on FDA-registered Class 1 status that is paperwork, not a 510(k) clearance.

By the RecoveryScored editorial team · Reviewed 2026-05-31

1.1

Limited

Composite (0-10), pemf-v1.0

Confidence: Verified

Bottom line

In our scoring, Oska Pulse earns 1.1 out of 10 (Limited). It markets an intensity level rather than a field strength in real units with a frequency, so we found no usable field spec to verify. Note that it is FDA registered, not 510(k) cleared. This is informational only, not medical advice.

Our take

Oska Pulse lands in our lowest band, at 1.1 out of 10. It is weakest on Frequency & Programmability (1.0/10). Key flag: No published field strength in real units (markets a unit-less intensity level or only a coverage area), so there is nothing to verify.

This device does not publish a field strength in real units alongside a stated frequency, so it is capped on Verified Field Spec, our heaviest dimension. Read a low band here as "the field claim cannot be checked", not a judgement on how it feels to use - which is not something we score. The regulatory, programmability, and coverage rows below tell the rest.

Flags

· No published field strength in real units (markets a unit-less intensity level or only a coverage area), so there is nothing to verify.
· Markets FDA registration/listing, which is paperwork, not a 510(k) clearance.

By the numbers

Format: wearable
Field strength: unit-less intensity level, no field figure
Frequency: 1-150 Hz
Waveform: not disclosed
Adjustable: fixed
FDA status: registered/listed only (not a clearance)
Certification: none published
Applicators: 1
App / programs: no
Warranty: not stated
Price: $399

Strengths

No standout strengths in our scoring.

Watch-outs

- Verified Field Spec: 0.0/10
- Regulatory Honesty: 0.0/10
- Frequency & Programmability: 1.0/10
- Coverage & Applicators: 3.0/10
- Value: 2.5/10
- No published field strength in real units (markets a unit-less intensity level or only a coverage area), so there is nothing to verify.
- Markets FDA registration/listing, which is paperwork, not a 510(k) clearance.

Who it is for

· People who want a portable, localized device

Who should skip it

· Anyone who wants to know the actual field strength and frequency - this device does not publish a usable spec
· Buyers who read 'FDA registered' as a clearance - it is paperwork, not a clearance
· Value-focused buyers - it scores poorly on what we weight

How it scored

Verified Field Spec

0.0/10 · 30%

A magnetic flux density in real units (microtesla or gauss) published WITH a stated frequency in Hz, ideally with the waveform. A unit-less intensity level or a peak with no frequency is not a usable spec.

·No published field strength Cno µT/gauss figure - An intensity dial in levels, or a stated coverage area with no field strength in microtesla or gauss, cannot be checked or compared between devices.

Regulatory Honesty

0.0/10 · 20%

A real FDA 510(k) clearance (rare in consumer PEMF) versus FDA registration/listing used as if it were a clearance, plus electrical/EMC certification, recall history, and warranty.

·FDA registered/listed, not cleared Aregistration/listing only - FDA registration or listing is paperwork any maker can file; it is not a finding of effectiveness and not a 510(k) clearance.

Frequency & Programmability

1.0/10 · 15%

Whether frequency and intensity are adjustable across a stated range, and whether control is programmable.

+1Stated frequency range B1-150 Hz - Publishes a frequency range rather than a single unstated value.

Coverage & Applicators

3.0/10 · 15%

What the device actually covers: a full-body mat, a targeted local coil, or a wearable, and how many applicators it drives.

+2Wearable form factor Cwearable - A wearable treats a localized area and is portable.
+1Single applicator C1 applicator - One applicator.

Value

2.5/10 · 20%

Price against the median for its format (full-body mat, targeted coil, or wearable).

+2.5Price vs format median A$399 (near class median) - Price scored against the median for its format. Format median about $339.

What to know before buying

· Publishes no field strength in any unit, only a coverage area and an automatic 1 to 150 Hz sweep, which is the weakest field disclosure in our catalog.
· Markets itself as an 'FDA-registered Class 1' device; that is registration/listing, not a 510(k) clearance, and no clearance was found.
· A single-button wearable puck with fixed 90- or 180-minute programs and no adjustable settings.

FAQ

What field strength does the Oska Pulse publish?: It publishes no field strength in any unit, only a coverage area and an automatic 1 to 150 Hz sweep, which is the weakest field disclosure in our catalog. In our scoring there is no field figure to verify, so the field dimension is capped and flagged.
Does 'FDA-registered Class 1' mean the Oska Pulse is FDA cleared?: No. In our framing FDA registration/listing is paperwork, not a 510(k) clearance, and we found no clearance for the device, so we flag the registration language rather than crediting a clearance.

Compared head-to-head

Last reviewed 2026-05-31. Scored under pemf-v1.0. See the methodology. Informational only, not medical advice. We score disclosure and specs, not health outcomes.