PEMF · Compare
Bemer Pro-Set vs Oska Pulse
These sit at opposite ends of our two PEMF axes. The Bemer publishes a checkable field at a stated frequency and holds a real clearance; the Oska publishes no field figure and is registered, not cleared. In our view the Bemer is far stronger on both the field-spec and regulatory axes, though it costs many times more; the Oska's appeal is portability and price, not disclosure.
A regulatory and disclosure contrast. The Bemer Pro-Set ($5,890) publishes a low field of about 3.5 to 35 microtesla at stated frequencies and holds genuine FDA 510(k) clearances. The Oska Pulse ($399) is a pocket wearable that publishes a 1 to 150 Hz frequency sweep and a coverage area but no field strength in any unit, and leans on FDA-registered Class 1 status, which is paperwork, not a clearance.
| $5,890 | Price | $399 |
| 35 µT at frequency | Field spec | no figure |
| 10-33 Hz | Frequency | 1-150 Hz |
| disclosed | Waveform | not disclosed |
| 510(k) cleared | FDA | registered only |
| full body mat | Format | wearable |
Score breakdown
| 8.0 | Verified Field Spec30% | 0.0 |
| 8.0 | Regulatory Honesty20% | 0.0 |
| 6.0 | Frequency & Programmability15% | 1.0 |
| 7.0 | Coverage & Applicators15% | 3.0 |
| 5.0 | Value20% | 2.5 |
FAQ
- Is the Oska Pulse FDA cleared?
- No. Oska leans on FDA-registered Class 1 status, which is a listing, not a 510(k) clearance. In our dataset only the Bemer holds a genuine 510(k) clearance. We treat registered and cleared as strictly different and credit only the real clearance.
- Does the Oska publish a field strength?
- No. It publishes a 1 to 150 Hz frequency sweep and a coverage area but no field strength in microtesla or gauss, so there is no field figure for us to check. The Bemer publishes about 3.5 to 35 microtesla at stated frequencies, which our heaviest axis can credit.