PEMF · Compare
Bemer Pro-Set vs Swiss Bionic Omnium1
The Bemer scores well ahead because its field claim is complete (a strength at a stated frequency) and it has real clearances. The Omnium1 is the cautionary case: listing microtesla is not enough on its own, because without a stated frequency the field figure still cannot be read as a usable spec.
Both are premium, tablet- or controller-driven full-body systems that publish per-applicator field strengths in microtesla. The difference is what else they disclose. The Bemer states its field at two named frequencies and holds genuine FDA 510(k) clearances; the Omnium1 lists microtesla maxima and names its waveforms but does not cleanly publish a frequency range, and is FDA registered only.
| $5,890 | Price | $4,000 |
| 35 µT at frequency | Field spec | 120 µT peak (not a spec) |
| 10-33 Hz | Frequency | not stated |
| disclosed | Waveform | disclosed |
| 510(k) cleared | FDA | registered only |
| full body mat | Format | full body mat |
Score breakdown
| 8.0 | Verified Field Spec30% | 0.0 |
| 8.0 | Regulatory Honesty20% | 0.0 |
| 6.0 | Frequency & Programmability15% | 9.0 |
| 7.0 | Coverage & Applicators15% | 7.0 |
| 5.0 | Value20% | 5.0 |
FAQ
- The Omnium1 publishes microtesla, so why is its field score capped?
- Because a field strength means little without the frequency it runs at. The Omnium1 lists per-applicator microtesla maxima but buries frequency in program logic rather than stating a range, so we cannot read it as a usable spec and cap the field dimension.