PEMF · Compare
EarthPulse ProPlus vs NeoRhythm
Both lead with a peak rather than a fully sustained field spec, so neither is credited on our heaviest axis, but the EarthPulse discloses more around it: an honest in-use range and a named waveform. In our view the EarthPulse is the more transparent device; the NeoRhythm is the cheaper, more wearable form factor with a wider stated frequency range.
Two lower-cost, sleep-leaning devices with different disclosure. The EarthPulse ProPlus ($499) is an electromagnet coil system that publishes both a 1,100-gauss peak and an honest in-use range, a clear sub-15 Hz band, and a named square waveform. The NeoRhythm ($279) is an app-controlled wearable with a usable 1 to 303 Hz range, but it leads intensity with a peak gauss figure and unit-less levels.
| $499 | Price | $279 |
| 110000 µT peak (not a spec) | Field spec | 2500 µT peak (not a spec) |
| 0.5-14.4 Hz | Frequency | 1-303 Hz |
| disclosed | Waveform | not disclosed |
| none claimed | FDA | none claimed |
| targeted coil | Format | wearable |
Score breakdown
| 2.0 | Verified Field Spec30% | 0.0 |
| 1.0 | Regulatory Honesty20% | 1.0 |
| 8.0 | Frequency & Programmability15% | 10.0 |
| 5.0 | Coverage & Applicators15% | 3.0 |
| 5.0 | Value20% | 5.0 |
FAQ
- Does either publish a usable field spec?
- Neither fully clears our bar: the EarthPulse leads with a 1,100-gauss peak (though it also publishes an honest in-use range and a named square waveform), and the NeoRhythm pairs a peak gauss figure with unit-less levels. The EarthPulse's extra disclosure - an in-use range and a stated waveform - is what separates them in our scoring.