Red light · Compare
Infraredi Full Body Max vs Mito MitoPRO 1500
In our view the MitoPRO 1500 is the more transparent buy: its output is measured at a usable distance and it costs less, while the Infraredi's 167 cannot be credited without a stated distance. The Infraredi's flexibility and five-wavelength spectrum are real perks, but on the metric we lead with, the measured panel wins.
Two full-body panels under $1,000. The Infraredi Full Body Max ($949) is a flexible five-wavelength panel with third-party spectrum testing, but its 167 mW/cm² claim is given with no usable distance, so we do not credit it. The MitoPRO 1500 ($799) is independently measured at about 76 at 6 inches.
| $949 | Price | $799 |
| not stated at distance | Irradiance @6in | 76 mW/cm² |
| $0.17 | Cost per cm² | $0.20 |
| 630/660/810/830/850 nm | Wavelengths | 630/660/830/850 nm |
| 5,500 cm² (full body) | Coverage | 3,935 cm² (full body) |
| registered/listed only | FDA | registered/listed only |
Score breakdown
| 2.0 | Verified Irradiance30% | 8.0 |
| 10.0 | Wavelengths20% | 10.0 |
| 10.0 | EMF & Flicker15% | 10.0 |
| 8.0 | Value20% | 10.0 |
| 7.0 | Build & Coverage15% | 7.0 |
FAQ
- Is the Infraredi's 167 mW/cm² credited?
- No. It is published with no usable treatment distance, so we cap and flag it, the same way we treat any surface or no-distance claim. The MitoPRO 1500's roughly 76 mW/cm² is independently measured at 6 inches, so it is the figure we can compare.