Red light · Compare
Mito MitoPRO 1500 vs PlatinumLED BIOMAX 300
Pick by format. For whole-body sessions the MitoPRO 1500 gives far more coverage per dollar and a slightly higher measured number. For a smaller footprint with the widest spectrum, the BIOMAX 300's seven wavelengths and independent 70 mW/cm² make it the more transparent half-body buy. Both are honestly specified, in our view.
Two of the better-value measured panels we score, in different format classes. The MitoPRO 1500 ($799) is a large full-body panel measured at about 76 mW/cm² at 6 inches; the BIOMAX 300 ($659) is a smaller half-body panel measured at about 70, but with seven wavelengths against the Mito's four.
| $799 | Price | $659 |
| 76 mW/cm² | Irradiance @6in | 70 mW/cm² |
| $0.20 | Cost per cm² | $0.60 |
| 630/660/830/850 nm | Wavelengths | 480/630/660/810/830/850/1060 nm |
| 3,935 cm² (full body) | Coverage | 1,100 cm² (half body) |
| registered/listed only | FDA | registered/listed only |
Score breakdown
| 8.0 | Verified Irradiance30% | 10.0 |
| 10.0 | Wavelengths20% | 10.0 |
| 10.0 | EMF & Flicker15% | 10.0 |
| 10.0 | Value20% | 2.0 |
| 7.0 | Build & Coverage15% | 4.0 |
FAQ
- Which has more wavelengths?
- The BIOMAX 300 spans seven wavelengths (480 to 1060 nm); the MitoPRO 1500 uses four (630/660/830/850 nm). Both cover the core red and near-infrared bands; the BIOMAX adds blue and a 1060 nm band.