Skip to content
RecoveryScored

Red light · Compare

Mito MitoPRO 1500 vs PlatinumLED BIOMAX 300

Pick by format. For whole-body sessions the MitoPRO 1500 gives far more coverage per dollar and a slightly higher measured number. For a smaller footprint with the widest spectrum, the BIOMAX 300's seven wavelengths and independent 70 mW/cm² make it the more transparent half-body buy. Both are honestly specified, in our view.

Two of the better-value measured panels we score, in different format classes. The MitoPRO 1500 ($799) is a large full-body panel measured at about 76 mW/cm² at 6 inches; the BIOMAX 300 ($659) is a smaller half-body panel measured at about 70, but with seven wavelengths against the Mito's four.

$799Price$659
76 mW/cm²Irradiance @6in70 mW/cm²
$0.20Cost per cm²$0.60
630/660/830/850 nmWavelengths480/630/660/810/830/850/1060 nm
3,935 cm² (full body)Coverage1,100 cm² (half body)
registered/listed onlyFDAregistered/listed only

Score breakdown

8.0Verified Irradiance30%10.0
10.0Wavelengths20%10.0
10.0EMF & Flicker15%10.0
10.0Value20%2.0
7.0Build & Coverage15%4.0

FAQ

Which has more wavelengths?
The BIOMAX 300 spans seven wavelengths (480 to 1060 nm); the MitoPRO 1500 uses four (630/660/830/850 nm). Both cover the core red and near-infrared bands; the BIOMAX adds blue and a 1060 nm band.