PEMF · Compare
OMI Full Body Mat vs HealthyLine Platinum
The OMI is the better value on what we score: a genuinely disclosed spec across a wider frequency range, at well under half the price. The HealthyLine costs more because it is several products in one mat, not because its PEMF is better specified.
Both mats do the rare thing: publish a field strength in real units at a stated frequency rather than a peak headline. The OMI states 2.2 gauss across 1 to 99 Hz with a named sine waveform; the HealthyLine states about 3 gauss across 1 to 30 Hz and layers PEMF with far-infrared heat, photon LEDs, and gemstones. Both are FDA registered, not cleared.
| $990 | Price | $2,499 |
| 220 µT at frequency | Field spec | 300 µT at frequency |
| 1-99 Hz | Frequency | 1-30 Hz |
| disclosed | Waveform | disclosed |
| registered only | FDA | registered only |
| full body mat | Format | full body mat |
Score breakdown
| 8.0 | Verified Field Spec30% | 8.0 |
| 2.0 | Regulatory Honesty20% | 1.0 |
| 8.0 | Frequency & Programmability15% | 8.0 |
| 5.0 | Coverage & Applicators15% | 5.0 |
| 8.0 | Value20% | 8.0 |
FAQ
- Is the higher-gauss HealthyLine the stronger device?
- Both publish low, honest field figures (about 3 gauss versus 2.2 gauss), so neither is a peak-headline device. We rank on disclosure, frequency range, and value, where the cheaper OMI comes out ahead; the HealthyLine's extra cost is the heating and light layers, not the PEMF spec.