Red light · Compare
Red Light Rising Full Stack vs Bon Charge Full Body Max
Red Light Rising edges it for disclosing an at-distance figure we can credit. Bon Charge's surface-only number is not comparable, and its 1-year warranty trails the field.
Both headline big surface irradiance numbers. The difference is disclosure: Red Light Rising also publishes about 100 mW/cm² at 20 cm (a usable distance), while Bon Charge gives only a surface figure with no usable distance.
| $890 | Price | $999 |
| 100 mW/cm² | Irradiance @6in | not stated at distance |
| $0.41 | Cost per cm² | $0.62 |
| 660/850 nm | Wavelengths | 660/850 nm |
| 2,160 cm² (full body) | Coverage | 1,612 cm² (full body) |
| none claimed | FDA | registered/listed only |
Score breakdown
| 6.0 | Verified Irradiance30% | 0.0 |
| 8.0 | Wavelengths20% | 8.0 |
| 10.0 | EMF & Flicker15% | 10.0 |
| 7.0 | Value20% | 0.0 |
| 7.0 | Build & Coverage15% | 5.0 |
FAQ
- Why is one credited for irradiance and the other not?
- Red Light Rising publishes about 100 mW/cm² at 20 cm, a usable treatment distance. Bon Charge publishes only a surface (panel-face) figure, which we do not credit because it cannot be compared.